"What a stupid I am to be wrong here," De Vicenzo said after realizing his misfortune.
The Masters has been the scene for some of the greatest victories in golf, but it has also been the scene of one of the most crushing defeats due to a golf ruling. In 1968, Argentinean Roberto DeVicenzo, the reigning British Open Champion, finished the final round of the Masters with what seemed to be a 65 to tie for the lead and the promise of a playoff. Tommy Aaron, who kept DeVicenzo’s score, mistakenly marked down a four for the 17th hole instead of a three, which was DeVicenzo’s actual score.
DeVicenzo signed the card, and when he did that, he signed for 66 instead of a 65, thus giving the 1968 Masters to Bob Goalby. DeVicenzo had become the victim of Rule 6-6d which states: “The competitor is responsible for the correctness of the score recorded for each hole on his score card. If he returns a score for any hole lower than actually taken, he is disqualified. If he returns a score for any hole higher than actually taken, the score as returned stands.”
The Masters has also provided other memorable Rules incidents and I will highlight a couple of those for your interest. In 2008, Padraig Harrington penalized himself one stroke because his ball had moved after he addressed it, even though the movement was obviously caused by a gusting wind (Rule18-2b).
Also in 2008, Rory McIlroy failed to hit his ball out of a bunker and then kicked/smoothed the sand. If it had been ruled that he kicked the sand out of frustration he would have been disqualified, as Decision 13-4/0.5 states that kicking the ground in the hazard constitutes testing the condition. Fortunately for Rory, the Committee accepted his explanation that he was just smoothing the sand with his foot, which does not incur a penalty, as per Exception 2 to Rule 13-4.
Amateur players are going to be pleased with some of the rule changes for 2012. Amateur golfers all over the world will now be allowed to play for unlimited hole – in – one prizes.
In the past, the rules allowed for amateurs to receive only small prizes, and that accepting something of greater value would force golfers to surrender their amateur status. In one high profile instance, Derek Lawrenson, a golf writer for The Daily Mail newspaper in London, England won a Lamborghini but had to forfeit his amateur status. The governing bodies of the USGA and R & A have determined that “the special nature of a hole – in –one during a round of golf means that restrictions on the prizes offered have been lifted.”
In addition, the new Rules of Amateur Status include changes for elite amateur golfers aimed at easing the move from amateur to professional. It follows a far-reaching four-year review of amateurism in golf, which even questioned the need for a set of rules and has resulted in the first-ever uniform worldwide code for amateur status.
“We felt the time was right to carry out a fundamental review of the Rules of Amateur Status”, said R & A Director of Rules David Rickman. “We were conscious that many sports had done away with amateur status rules and we felt that was an appropriate question for us to ask. We concluded that it is very important that golf retains its amateur regulations, mainly because of the self-regulating nature of the game both in terms of the playing rules and handicapping,” he added. “We felt that uncontrolled financial incentives could place too much pressure on these important features.”
Excluding hole – in – one prizes from the general prize limit and allowing high value prizes, including cash, to be awarded brings the R & A in line with the USGA.
Also under the new rules aimed at amateurs thinking of a professional career, players will now be able to enter into an agreement with an agent or sponsor as long as they do not receive any financial gain while still and amateur.
There is a change in Rule 12 -1 (Searching For And Identifying Ball) that now allows a player to search for a ball that is covered by sand, anywhere on the course, by moving the sand without being penalized should the ball be moved during the search. This is consistent with the Rule in the past that has allowed the player to search for his ball in a bunker by moving sand if necessary. If the ball moves during the search, the player can replace the ball by recreating the lie, and there is no penalty.
Also, if you believe your ball is covered by loose impediments in either a bunker or water hazard, so that you cannot identify it, you may without penalty move the loose impediments to find the ball and identify it. However, if the ball moves during the removal of the loose impediments, you will be penalized one stroke under Rule 18 – 2a (Ball at Rest Moved by Player, Partner, Caddie or Equipment) and the ball must be replaced. There is no penalty if the ball moves during the replacement of the loose impediments.
In the 2008 Zurich Classic, Stewart Cink was penalized when his caddie raked a bunker that was 185 yards from the green while Cink’s ball was at rest in a greenside bunker. This instance led to a decision that made reference to the fact that if the caddie was raking the bunker “soley for the purpose of caring for the course” there is no longer a penalty.
This concept has been carried further for 2012, by creating a new Exception 2 to Rule 13-4 (Ball in Hazard; Prohibited Action) that reads, “At any time, the player may smooth sand or soil in a hazard provided this is for the sole purpose of caring for the course and nothing is done to breach 13-2 (Improving Lie, Area of Intended Stance or Swing, or Line of Play) with respect to his next stroke. If a ball played from a hazard is outside the hazard after a stroke, the player may smooth the sand or soil in the hazard without restriction.” This Exception 2 of the rule grants players the right to smooth sand or soil in a bunker at any time, including before playing from the bunker, providing it is done for the sole purpose of caring for the course and nothing is done to improve the position or lie of the ball, the area of intended stance or swing, or the line of play. An example of this would be a player raking a bunker behind him as he enters the bunker and walks 30 yards to reach his ball.
In addition, if a stroke is made from within a bunker and the ball remains in the bunker, the player may rake the bunker as he walks to his ball that still is in the bunker. The player must not breach Rule 13-2 when doing his raking in both of the previous circumstances. Again, nothing can be done to improve the lie of the ball, the area of the intended stance or swing, or the line of play.
Frank Guastella, PGA Rules Official Michigan Section PGA
Staff Writer, Mike Fay Golf
If you have a question for Frank here’s where you can contact him.
This is a first in our new feature called Playing By The Rules. It’s my pleasure to introduce you to what has become a great friend of mine, Mr. Frank Guastella. Frank is a Michigan PGA Rules Official and has been contributing to the Ask The Pro Show on Twitter since it started. He is our “Resident Rules Official” on the show and I can count on him to spread his knowledge of the rules of golf to everyone. Thank you Frank for your time and effort with this project. Enjoy!-Mike
After a four year review of the Rules of Golf, the USGA and R&A have completed their study and amended nine principal regulations from the Rules of Golf. In addition, for the first time, there will be a joint publication of the Rules by both governing bodies. The changes became effective on January 1, 2012. For golfers who like to play by the rules, the changes will likely be welcomed for easing penalties and removing ambiguities.
Probably, one of the most anticipated changes was the definition of “Addressing the Ball”. The revision states that a player has addressed the ball when he has grounded the club immediately in front or immediately behind the ball, whether or not he has taken his stance. Note that the change does not require the player to place his feet in position for the stroke in order for the ball to be addressed, as was the case in the past. Also, note that there is no reference to addressing the ball in a hazard when the player has taken his stance. The omission of this requirement in 2012 infers that a player will never address his ball in a hazard unless he grounds his club, which would result in a two-stroke penalty in a stroke play event or loss of hole in a match play event. A benefit resulting from this change is that the player who places his feet in position for a stroke from the bunker and then watches as the wind or gravity causes the ball to move from its original position will no longer be penalized one stroke under Rule 18-2b and the player would play the ball where it comes to rest, unless he caused the movement by some other action. Many times players were penalized and they did not do anything to make the ball move.
Three prominent examples of when a gust of wind influenced a ball at rest were: Padraig Harrington at the 2009 Masters, Fredrik Jacobson at the 2008 British Open and Rory McIroy at the 2011 British Open. Each was charged a stroke. Under the revised rule, this would not have happened.
Over the next few months I will cover the remaining changes and revisions so that you can start your season “Playing By the Rules”.
Frank Guastella, PGA Rules Official Michigan Section PGA
Staff Writer, Mike Fay Golf
If you have a question for Frank here’s where you can contact him.
